Dave and Bill O'Reilly resmi resimleri fotoğrafları fotoğrafı indir download yükle

Anasayfa

Resimler

Dave and Bill O'Reilly

Resim Açıklaması

27 Ekim 2006 21:35:49
688047 Gösterim, 158 Yorum

Dave and Bill discuss what's going on in Iraq.

Benzer Resimler

		Bill O'Reilly gets his ass kicked by Phil Donahue!!

		Bill O'Reilly Hits The Wall

		Bill O'Reilly gets crazy

		Keith Olbermann Neuters Bill O'Reilly

		*Snoop Dogg Says: ''Fck Bill O'Reilly!'' TBOHipHop.net**

		Bill O'Reilly at his best

		O'Reilly on Letterman Show

		Olbermann spanks O'Reilly

		Letterman-O'Reilly: Round 2.1 - Long overdue bitch-slap !

		Bill O'Reilly on Marijuana / It's Just a Plant

		Camron Vs O'Reily

		Bill O'Reilly Attacks ABC And Rosie -Part 1

		Camron on O'Reilly

		Cpl. Matt Sanchez O'Reilly Factor

		Billo replies to Snoop

		danah on O'Reilly Factor

		O'Reilly Police in the Zone

		Oprah Winfrey and David Letterman Part 2

		Oprah Winfrey Show Visits David Letterman Show Part 1

		Is Jesus on the Side of Bush and the Republicans?

		Oprah Winfrey and David Letterman Part 3

		o'reilly on david letterman

		Your TV is Controlling Your Mind! Turn It Off!

		Reality Check - Bill O'Reilly Facts(24-July'08 Thur)

		Inevitable. the story of Hillary, Rudy, Obama, and McCain

		Oprah Winfrey, David Letterman Part 1

		Oprah Hangs Out with David Letterman Part 1

		Oprah Winfrey Show visits David Letterman Show Part 2

		Oprah Winfrey Show Visits David Letterman Show Part 3

		Is Keith Olbermann Fit to Anchor Election Night Coverage?

		Bush Naturally

		Oprah Winfrey and David Letterman Part 2

		Oprah Winfrey and David Letterman Part 3

		A Trip to the Farm : Away from politics

		ESPN, Juan Williams Compare Shaq With Imus

		Juan Williams And ESPN Compare Shaq To Imus

Bu Resime Yapılan Yorumlar (158)

hutchtv

Hopefully, we want truth and justice to win in Iraq... and want a leader and a government that represent our ideals of life and liberty to lead the way...

mysterbigg

Idiot. Win what? It's not even a war; it's a conflict. We ousted Saddam, and now we're just over there to defend ourselves. Even though I don't support the CONFLICT, I support our troops-yes, that is possible. Oh, and Dave, Jon Stewart and Stephen colbert are Gods!

dogsbd

What is there to think about David? Yes you want the US to win or no you do not want the US to win! But never mind, your hesitation speaks VOLUMES. The murderous jihadists thank you.

byebobby

If your not smart enough to debate them, make jokes!

dynamo9

> However you define "winning", we are there now and committed. All the marketing points covered to sell the war are done, "we" have no reason, right, or excuse to still be there. If good people are going to die for a cause, it had damned well better be one has some kind of merit. That is not the case in Iraq.

dan4real2

I have alot more respect for Letterman after seeing that.

gloomyoutlook

I saw this on tv last night...twas great. For a while I was unsure about Letterman, he doesn't make nearly as much fun of G.W. than he did of Clinton, but I'm glad he got his views out there. Bill O'Reilly, what a pathetic man... Always playing the patriotism card, do you love this country, do you want us to win... It's NOT JUST ABOUT THE U.S... Fucking maniac pisses me off, but what pisses me off more so is that so many morons actually watch his show, or Fox News at all.

irkedroyally

Letterman's a big phoney.500,000 kids starved to death under the oil-for-food scam while the UN and Saddam profited from it.We would have to be in Iraq for the next 25 years to match that death toll.

abdo84

its about time someone stands up to that loud mouthed brainwashed o'reily.

riethc

Fantastic! O'Reily, America would be better off without your kind. Stop making up these stupid talking points that turns everyone into either category A's or B's. Arguments that end in "yes" or "no" answers aren't all there is. If this was any other time predating the 20th century the mobs would wring you up by your neck for your deceptions.

JustinMShaw

The hardest part of that question to answer is what it means for us to win. We never really had any clear and realistic objectives after we got Saddam.

qwichet

Letterman can not answer a yes or no question. Who was the Idiot?

Grendel24

I actually like and respect both of these guys. I would be much more interesed to see them debate without a biased audience.

Garageband

I can't believe that a comedian put it so much better then any politican! It's so well said and so true.

apocalypsenerd

"It's not easy for me because I'm thoughtful." HA! Hilarious.

marcellafaustini

win what

Blue108

Nice come back. That was a loaded question imo, and he did a pretty good job handling it.

spiderbaby1958

Everything W told us about the reason, the effect, the cost of the war turned out to be false. Whether by dishonesty or incompetence matters little. W squandered our trust and that's bad leadership. If u want to blame "liberals", you'll only lose the mainstream further.

calsonicSTi

So what was HIS answer? It looked like he was just dancing around the question. Im not for the war, he just didnt give an answer...

bushisaturd

Once again, Bill O'Reilly shows what an idiot he is.

Shawlanis

However you define "winning", we are there now and committed. Let us not leave before the Iraqi people, who have sacraficed so much against the insurgency, can stand on their own feet. We have fought a war half assed before and left an ally swinging in the wind..Vietnam. Lets not do it again. We owe it to those folks and more importantly, to the troops we have lost.

sailoryaoimoon

Bill O'Reilly is just a poor excuse for a human being, in general. This isn't about him being republican or being outright obnoxious about our government. I see him as a sad excuse of a man who doesn't realized when he's wrong, when to shut up, or for that matter when to acknowledge the rights of human beings as well as human decency. Bill O'Reilly, for all I care you can drop dead.

pochs

To quote the late, great Phil Ochs: "We're fighting in a war we lost before the war began . . "

thedailyenglishshow

What does "win in Iraq" mean?

rdiggity1

You can't institute american style government in an area that doesn't separate church and state, these people are driven by religious histories and influences, the reason sadam was in power was that people were more afraid of him than their gods, oil is not worth us being that feared and we can't be their forever

bearshaman

Here's how we win in Iraq: we get Mikey J. Fox to loan us the Delorean between stem cell commercials, go back in time, and stop the Iraq war from starting! Maybe we could just shock Sadam with 1.21 jigowatts. That's do it.

bigsoleproductions

When did 'Winning' have so many definitions? Win means win. The Iraqi government stands on it's own and becomes our ally in the most dangerous region in the world. THAT'S VICTORY! War War II and War on Terror may be from different times, but it's still war. We won then, and we'll do it again.

Shiprekk

o'reilly you are the trash television of politics. lowest common denominator programming for the great undecided masses to find intelligent. i do not. your debate skills are nonexistent and amount, basically, to "my microphone is louder." Letterman ate your liver with a nice chianti, pantyboy. go back to Fox where anyone who disagrees with you is fired.

theucharist

politicans are all crooked, but what sucks is when the media--like o'reilly--start being crooked too. that question sets up false pretence. you can't say "i'd like america to lose in iraq" because that is blantantly unpatriotic. but saying yes opens you to the possibility of having to stay there for many more years. it's a crooked politicians trick, and people who believe o'reilly is anything other than a mouthpiece for the gop are ignorant.

1980jlifts

" I have never been so proud of Letterman "..WTF..who gives a fuck what either of these windbags think. This guy works under corporate interests that support war. If he really had balls he would mention that.At least loudmouth Bill is not a hypocrite..just an idiot. Form your opinion based on YOUR OWN beliefs. Mine is that we never should have been over there and should quit relying on foreign oil...but that would be too easy.

haredog62

What has America's "winning" got to do with anything? Over 600,000 Iraqi dead since the invasion, and for what? Some good ol' boys' ignorance and delusions? O'Reilly is a disgrace to anyone with an Irish surname.

damnitsderek

I hate Bill O'Reilly.

SergioMomarsh

What exactly is "TO WIN IN IRAQ" these days?

joektoe

senrrt: Your a jackass. Its not a yes or no question. How can we "win" with over a 3 thousand american deaths, hundreds of thousands of Iraqi deaths, and we have lost so much credibility with the world?? I have never been so proud of letterman. Don't you think something bad is going on when our "Entertainers" feel the need to step in and say something????

drumm2

Belligerent
Idiot
Lier
Loud

yezsyr

Sigh. What constitutes victory now? Soldiers die every day. Iraqi could be getting killed at a rate of 100 a day. The regime change is going horrible. There is no victory. There is only an abomination that needs to be helped, and oour boys being in the line of fire is NOT helping!

DanielGiuditta

God, I love Letterman. He doesn't come across as Liberal or Conservative. Hawkish or Doveish. He just seems rational, and no matter what your politics, it seems right. Letterman was one of the first celebrities to start the flag waving and drum beating in jingoistic post-911, but after hearing what he just said, I realize that mainstream america is not nearly as stupid as the neo-cons think they are.

seamuspcoy

In response to those who would ask, "Do you want America to win in Iraq?" I would ask, "Do you want thousands more American soldiers to die in Iraq?"

ribbonsonbedposts

YES! Go Letterman. Kick that bastard's ass. "It's not an easy question to me because I'm a thoughtful person." So simple, so beautiful. I'm near tears. =)

x311kevin87x

Its not about winning, and its not about breaking even. Its about cutting losses...

frb01

There is a real problem and that real problem is how do we build an exit plan now that avoids a another major mid-east war which would involve the US being dragged back into the mess over there again at some time in the future. I think the politicians should for once listen to the military and see if the military has an action plan to get us out.

theoryhead

It seems to me that the argument "they are both making good points" makes little sense. O'Reilly has not made "a point"; he asked a question about winning, one that was vague and that probably seemed oversimplistic to anyone who has reasonably considered the Iraq situation. Letterman refused to answer the question, most likely on this basis. So technically, neither person made "a point" as much as one asked a question and the other refused to answer it.

zhovenga

Who can win in a war? , letterman rules!

buffav

the best part is when dave says...how bout that? that was a good one

PUMPKINCOWBOY

Go Dave!

vmhammond

wow...i cant believe i missed this. dave made bill o look silly.

mtbikemikeg

Nice!! But, what is the specific definition of "winning in Iraq"? Do we "win" when we find the WMDs? Do we "win" when all of the oil is claimed American? Do we "win" when there are no more people upset over the injustice of the many subversive wars/battles/operations we've held over the past 40 years? If these are the terms, simple logic dictates we will never "win".

Wicked583

If Bill was slightly more tasteful with his opinions, I could respect him, but i don't at all...

bmb2jn

I'm surprised O'Reily didn't suffer third degree burns from Letterman's last comment.

shpunter

This is not a football game where someone wins and everyone gets to go home. You can say, "Hey, I just want to support the troops," but that support might result in thousands or tens of thousands more U.S. soldiers being killed than if the U.S. were to change its role. A serious discussion has to go beyond winning the war. It has to define what it means to "win" this war, and look at what it would mean to "win the peace," and ask if this is even a realistic possibility.